CNN’s Debate Debacle
I watched the rebroadcast of last week’s CNN Democratic debate over the weekend. (Why, I don’t know … other than I have no social life.) In watching the encore presentation, it seemed even more apparent that the audience participation segment was nothing more than a blatantly scripted sham. Pathetically obvious, and not particularly well-directed by the CNN powers that be. So poorly done, in fact, that I’m rather surprised they would have chosen to air it a second time.
One especially disappointing performance: LaShannon Spencer (the one with the big purple cape around her neck … quite an accent piece.) I hope she didn’t quit her day job, because the fledgling actress was certainly less than stellar the other night, no doubt much to the dismay of the CNN producers charged with casting the roles of Undecided Voters. She may have aced the audition, but when it came time for her limelight debut, she flubbed big time. In a brain fart moment, when given mike time by CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux, she totally missed what was supposed to the be the point of her assigned question. She started promisingly enough …
“We constantly hear health care questions, and questions pertaining to the war. But we don’t hear questions pertaining to the Supreme Court justice or education. My question is, if you are elected president, what qualities must the appointee possess?”
… but under pressure forgot to bring up that whole abortion rights, Roe v. Wade vote thing. And on live TV! No second takes. Thank goodness, Suzanne (pronounced with the classier “ah”) Malveaux was still standing by, her improvisational acting prowess saving the day. Theatrical disaster averted. Perhaps a bit awkwardly, but at least she got the storyline back on track so that we, the viewers, would not miss what was intended to be a key plot point.
After duly reiterating and directing the question to Christopher Dodd, she managed to clarify what Ms. Spencer really meant to ask by adding whether or not he would “require nominees to support abortion rights.”
Whew! Close call, that was. Dialogue back on track. A textbook-worthy example to all aspiring cable news talking head wannabes on how to handle a would-be debacle on live television. In fact, I was so impressed with Malveaux’s adroit handling of the situation, I thought I might peruse the official CNN transcript in order to better-appreciate such fine work.
But, wait … dagnabbit! Apparently the network’s own transcriptionist wasn’t able to document that particular exchange, including Malveaux’s savvy save, due to all of the crosstalk. From the published CNN transcript:
(CROSSTALK) DODD: First of all, thanks for your question …
Readers of the CNN.com transcript who may have missed the live performance might wonder … what was the question? Whaaa…? Because the question, well, just isn’t there. Damned crosstalk! Fortunately not all political pundits are quite so hearing-impaired as the hosting network’s own recordkeeper. Others were, surprisingly enough, indeed able to hear and report for posterity the dialogue in its entirety, in spite of all of the crosstalking mayhem.
Sarcasm aside, the situation was so appallingly handled by Suzanne Malveaux that I wonder if CNN simply decided to do some selective editing of the official transcript. Because really, it does kind of make them look rather stupid. Particularly with veteran reporter Malveaux on the scene.
For the most part, the majority of the audience members nailed their lines, although I think a few may have stumbled a bit. A teleprompter might have come in handy. Most recovered fairly well, however. Overall, I’d give the second act two stars … except, of course, for LaShannon, who may never act in Vegas again.
At least Maria Luisa, in the role of final questioner, didn’t falter! You know, the one who asked the “diamonds or pearls” question of Hillary Clinton. She came through like a pro, despite the fact that this was an apparent last-minute script change by CNN due to time constraints. But all performers have their critics, and she has apparently been taking a lot of flack for the frivolous nature of the question. Hey, y’all, back off! She was just following the director’s orders! That’s what great actors do.
As reported here by The Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder, according to Ms. Luisa, every question asked during the debate by the audience had to be approved by CNN. She was asked to add some lighthearted and fun questions to the mix. Originally, it seems, TPTB had decided to weed out the frivolous, and instead approved Luisa’s prefered question, regarding the nuclear dump that is Yucca Mountain, an issue that she truly thought important.
Unfortunately, time ran short, and according to an excerpt from her MySpace page:
“CNN ran out of time and used me to close the debate with the pearls/diamonds question. Seconds later this girl comes up to me and says, ‘you gave our school a bad reputation.’ Well, I had to explain to her that every question from the audience was pre-planned and censored … See, the media chose what they wanted, not what the people or audience really wanted.”
The media pre-planning and censoring questions? Really? Well, surprise, surprise!
cnn, democratic debate, 2008 election, malveaux, cnn debate
November 20th, 2007 at 5:22 pm
“the one with the big purple cape around her neck … quite an accent piece.) I hope she didn’t quit her day job, because the fledgling actress was certainly less than stellar the other night”.
Doug,
ROTFLMAO! You are so funny!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
That makes me happy. Thanks, my new best friend!
November 21st, 2007 at 3:36 am
“hat makes me happy. Thanks, my new best friend!”
What a nice thing to say! I really was LMAO at your post. I heard on the news that that happened a lot. someone would ask a question and then the reporter would change it around. Ha the topic of Abortion come up a lot at the debates? I haven’t watched them all.
November 21st, 2007 at 3:38 am
Oops I meant “that” not hat LOL!
November 21st, 2007 at 1:59 pm
Hey Doug,
I’m just stopping by to wish a Happy Thanksgiving! Wish me luck, I’ll be spending it with my very republican in-laws LOL! They no longer support Bush, so I guess that’s one of the many things I can be thankful for. Unfortunately, they listen to Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage…Yikes!
November 24th, 2007 at 6:20 pm
Holy crap! Good luck with that! My family is all republican, too, but that’s only because they really don’t pay attention and don’t know any better. At least they certainly don’t listen to Rush and that a**hole Savage! Hope there was no bloodshed over the dinner table.
November 24th, 2007 at 7:03 pm
Hey Doug,
it was a very interesting Thanksgiving to say the least. I tried to avoid political talk, but..Of course someone had to bring it up. My father in-law asked which candidate I liked best. I said as of now I like Edwards. He says yes “he really wants to bring the troops home, which is good.”
My husband asked him which candidate he liked, he said he likes Mitt. My husband told him that Mitt doesn’t want to bring the troops home and he wants to make Gitmo bigger. He went on to ask my father in-law why he likes Mitt, and he couldn’t answer the question. What can I tell you, they watch Fox News and they are detached from reality. They vote based on Party, not what’s best for the country. He hates what Bush has done to our military, because he’s a veteran, but he lacks the conviction to seek change.
December 4th, 2007 at 1:19 am
I don’t give Fox News that much credit. People make up their own minds. Fox News is still vouching for the war…the majority of Americans want out…despite what Fox News is spinning.
December 4th, 2007 at 1:41 am
If you haven’t seen it, watch “OUTFOXED: Rupert Murdoch’s War On Journalism.”
December 4th, 2007 at 9:15 am
You can watch outfoxed here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428&q=outfoxed&total=242&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
I agree people make up their own minds, based on the information that they are given. I also think it depends on where that info comes from.
February 6th, 2008 at 10:44 pm
[...] watched CNN all last night to watch the coverage of the Super Tuesday primaries even after California was called [...]
February 22nd, 2008 at 12:05 am
[...] have been busting the chops of CNN anchors like Campbell Brown and Wolf Blitzer throughout the presidential primary season. Brown is [...]
April 1st, 2009 at 7:02 am
helo! Hot picture alert! If Paris Hilton is your fave, then I have a website for you to see. Who wants it?